Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Photo

Do Orbital Macs need better range?


  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

#1 OneEyeGuy16

OneEyeGuy16

    Crewman Apprentice

  • Members
  • 3 posts

Posted 26 December 2013 - 09:56 PM

I'm starting to think they do. Although they can one shot most ships I find the AI tends to hang back and let their bombers destroy them. Maybe it's just me but I'm finding it to be pretty frustrating. What do you think?

#2 Lord Stark

Lord Stark

    Warden of the North

  • Authorized Playtester
  • 677 posts
  • LocationWinterfell

Posted 26 December 2013 - 09:59 PM

No they don't.  In canon the Covenant did just that; sent in their borders/bombers to destroy them.  Guard your platforms with Sabers/ Longswords?



#3 XtremeRoflcopter

XtremeRoflcopter

    Petty Officer Second Class

  • Contributor
  • 387 posts
  • LocationWorking the till at the Bank of Rofl handing out loans to all the noobs.

Posted 26 December 2013 - 10:05 PM

Or you build the SMACs so the limits to their range just touches the exit radius for approaching ships. Since an SMAC outranges all covie ships (except super-cruiser) itll snipe a lot of them out quickly.


It's easier to work on a map if a lot of Rum is involved...

#4 Death

Death

    Death knows no bounds!

  • Members
  • 42 posts
  • LocationEverywhere

Posted 26 December 2013 - 10:12 PM

Or do both and make two defensive rings of SMACs.


  • Unikraken and Dianno5741 like this

The Machine is strong. We must purge the weak, hated flesh and replace it with the blessed purity of metal. Only through permanence can we truly triumph, only through the Machine can we find victory. Punish the flesh. Iron in mind and body. Hail the Machine!   - Paullian Blantar Iron-Father of the Kaargul Clan, Iron Hands Chapter.

 

We are born for a darker purpose than that of mere existence. There will come a time when stygian night never ends, where dead stars will spread before us like islands that slumber on the ocean, and when the beings that hid like shadows will feed on us forever. - Adept Corteswain at the Omniastery of Selethoth, shortly before his disappearance.


#5 HolyMith

HolyMith

    Crewman Apprentice

  • Members
  • 35 posts
  • LocationAbove the Damoclean Sword

Posted 26 December 2013 - 11:06 PM

I think the cooldown on their MAC's is too high. I Halo 2 I'm sure they fired a lot more often. In any case, My usual tactic is to have a ring of SMAC's covering the entry points to the system, a secondary ring to snipe heavies that make it past the primary ring, and as many squads of sabers as I can muster. Works well against harass forces, but any fleet big enough will swat it aside with little effort.



#6 Unikraken

Unikraken

    친애하는 지도자

  • Administrators
  • 2,910 posts
  • Steam:Unikraken
  • LocationNew Mexico

Posted 27 December 2013 - 12:01 AM

I think the cooldown on their MAC's is too high. I Halo 2 I'm sure they fired a lot more often.

In canon they fired every 5 seconds with a round that would literally destroy any Covenant ship that shows up. That doesn't work in a game. SMACs are not the end-all be-all to planetary defense, they're the start. They keep the AI from dropping a planet bomber on a world while you're busy elsewhere. You need hangars, a starbase, and potentially a back-up fleet to mount a good defense. That is canon right there.


[10:46:02 PM] VDNKh: Piercing Lance
[10:46:11 PM] VDNKh: fitting name for the ship that just fucked me

 

"Unikraken can soothe any nasties."


#7 HolyMith

HolyMith

    Crewman Apprentice

  • Members
  • 35 posts
  • LocationAbove the Damoclean Sword

Posted 27 December 2013 - 02:08 AM

In canon they fired every 5 seconds with a round that would literally destroy any Covenant ship that shows up. That doesn't work in a game. SMACs are not the end-all be-all to planetary defense, they're the start. They keep the AI from dropping a planet bomber on a world while you're busy elsewhere. You need hangars, a starbase, and potentially a back-up fleet to mount a good defense. That is canon right there.

They fire every 15-20 seconds in Halo 2 (which I would consider more authorative than books), so maybe you could nerf them by upping the price/construction time? I actually haven't timed the firing in-game. What is the actual cooldown?



#8 m468

m468

    Coordinator

  • Inactive Staff
  • 1,164 posts

Posted 27 December 2013 - 07:32 AM

The cool down in game for the SMACs weapon is 5 seconds. The ability that we gamve the SMAC disables it for 250 seconds after it is produced. That is how we nerfed the SMAC.
"Japan received freedom so hard it was atomizing." -VDNKh
Spoiler

#9 SPECTRE

SPECTRE

    Banned user who criticised terrorists

  • Members
  • 3,455 posts
  • LocationANGLIA BRUV, HOME TO THE PRODIGY, NON CRIMINAL GANGSTAS AND FARMERS

Posted 27 December 2013 - 07:35 AM

The cool down in game for the SMACs weapon is 5 seconds. The ability that we gamve the SMAC disables it for 250 seconds after it is produced. That is how we nerfed the SMAC.

I think that should come down just a bit, 180 seconds seems reasonable.


I'm back (temp)

Spoiler

#10 m468

m468

    Coordinator

  • Inactive Staff
  • 1,164 posts

Posted 27 December 2013 - 07:53 AM

It is designed to make the UNSC player pick what world he/she will defend particularly earlier in the game. The SMAC will not be the be all and end all defense for the UNSC. The SMACs are the cornerstone of your defense they must be backed up by sabers and a small fleet, whose only goal is to defend the SMACs.
"Japan received freedom so hard it was atomizing." -VDNKh
Spoiler

#11 SPECTRE

SPECTRE

    Banned user who criticised terrorists

  • Members
  • 3,455 posts
  • LocationANGLIA BRUV, HOME TO THE PRODIGY, NON CRIMINAL GANGSTAS AND FARMERS

Posted 27 December 2013 - 08:04 AM

It is designed to make the UNSC player pick what world he/she will defend particularly earlier in the game. The SMAC will not be the be all and end all defense for the UNSC. The SMACs are the cornerstone of your defense they must be backed up by sabers and a small fleet, whose only goal is to defend the SMACs.

Thats the thing, when me and scifi were playing him as cov, and myself as the UNSC, the sabres did nothing to his own fighter spam, and within 2 mins all my ODPs were orbital rubble, he cut straight through my fleet, and withing another 30 seconds the colony was gone, all the meanwhile i'm spamming destroyers and makos, to try and slow him, no effect at all.


I'm back (temp)

Spoiler

#12 Defender0

Defender0

    Reclaimer

  • Members
  • -1,937 posts

Posted 27 December 2013 - 08:37 AM

The cool down in game for the SMACs weapon is 5 seconds.

Actually, i decided to figure out the cooldown based on its DPS of 2400 and total damage of 30k, its got a cooldown of 12.5 seconds

 

EDIT: checked the entity file, has a ROF of 15 seconds, which doesnt make sense as ive never seen an SMAC with a DPS of 2000 (30,000/15)


  • SPECTRE likes this

#13 m468

m468

    Coordinator

  • Inactive Staff
  • 1,164 posts

Posted 27 December 2013 - 12:41 PM

Thats the thing, when me and scifi were playing him as cov, and myself as the UNSC, the sabres did nothing to his own fighter spam, and within 2 mins all my ODPs were orbital rubble, he cut straight through my fleet, and withing another 30 seconds the colony was gone, all the meanwhile i'm spamming destroyers and makos, to try and slow him, no effect at all.


Your defenses will not protect from a large covenant fleet. There is no way they would either. If the covenant come at you with their fleet you have to respond in kind as the UNSC you need to rush expand. Then you fortify what choke points you can. You use your fleet to support those defenses. That is how you defend. I've done it and many other playtesters and devs have done it.
"Japan received freedom so hard it was atomizing." -VDNKh
Spoiler

#14 firewarrior1705

firewarrior1705

    Crewman Apprentice

  • Members
  • 4 posts
  • LocationBucharest, Romania

Posted 28 December 2013 - 01:16 AM

Try augmenting your SMACs with mines. Place your SMACs in a ring pattern around your planet (make sure your other buildings are behind the SMACs so that they won't block their LOS) with overlaping fields of fire from 3 or 4 covering one zone at each time and place your mines at the very limit of the planet's gravity well. The enemy will be pounded by the mines as soon as they jump in, and if they try to move out of the kill zone and advance on your planet, your SMACs will give them a warm welcome.


  • D4RKST0RM99 and HolyMith like this

Axios!


#15 nightlight.zero

nightlight.zero

    Crewman Apprentice

  • Members
  • 11 posts

Posted 29 December 2013 - 10:27 PM

Yeah, see, I do that, and then I don't have to worry about enemy fleets at all, playing against Hard AIs.



#16 Spartan-117

Spartan-117

    Jon

  • Members
  • 108 posts
  • LocationBeyond the Wall knowing nothing - AKA England.

Posted 30 December 2013 - 07:58 AM

I like the SMAC's as they are. Don't want to make it too OP. I do enjoy sitting back and watching the covies slowly get destroyed.

 

I wouldnt mind a cove defense turret that takes up like 3 or 4 millitary points per turret, that way the covies have SOME defense but it is limited.

 

Il just... go and sit in the corner now.



#17 m468

m468

    Coordinator

  • Inactive Staff
  • 1,164 posts

Posted 30 December 2013 - 09:26 AM

The covenant's main defense is its ability to jump from any planet with a stabilization node to another they can show up at any planet that comes under attack if they build those structures.


"Japan received freedom so hard it was atomizing." -VDNKh
Spoiler

#18 Defender0

Defender0

    Reclaimer

  • Members
  • -1,937 posts

Posted 30 December 2013 - 09:28 AM

a stabilization nod

the only tactical structure youll ever need to build as the covenant



#19 Mrripley9

Mrripley9

    Chief Petty Officer

  • Authorized Playtester
  • 569 posts
  • Steam:The Rip-meister
  • LocationReach :P

Posted 04 January 2014 - 11:26 AM

the only tactical structure youll ever need to build as the covenant

Wait, what? I haven't seen that yet, what is it?


“Usually, the good Lord works in mysterious ways. But not today! This here is 66 tons of straight-up, H.E-spewing dee-vine intervention! If God is love, then you can call me 'Cupid'!”







76561198099678337.png


#20 SPECTRE

SPECTRE

    Banned user who criticised terrorists

  • Members
  • 3,455 posts
  • LocationANGLIA BRUV, HOME TO THE PRODIGY, NON CRIMINAL GANGSTAS AND FARMERS

Posted 04 January 2014 - 11:34 AM

I can see too many stabilization nodes breaking the game. If you build more than 10 the game gets a bit jumpy


I'm back (temp)

Spoiler




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users