Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Photo
- - - - -

Implementing Ideas(high charity)


  • Please log in to reply
48 replies to this topic

#41 fightin-first

fightin-first

    Crewman Apprentice

  • Members
  • 16 posts

Posted 20 August 2015 - 08:03 PM

yes 2 squids kissing.

damn uneven elephants



#42 Delyruin

Delyruin

    Crewman Apprentice

  • Members
  • 88 posts

Posted 28 August 2015 - 12:03 AM

We are currently exploring the possibility of High Charity being a one off starbase.

So, assuming I'm reading this right, the Covenant will only ever get one starbase per game?



#43 SiRD31M0S

SiRD31M0S

    Forum Jester

  • Authorized Playtester
  • 859 posts
  • Steam:sird31mos
  • LocationThe infinitesimal space between thoughts, on the cusp of uncountable instances of possibility.

Posted 28 August 2015 - 12:13 AM

So, assuming I'm reading this right, the Covenant will only ever get one starbase per game?

"One-off" meaning you can only get one of it, ever. Its relation with the Haven is all up in the air.


I am a naturally philosophical and industrious evil.

 

It's all or nothin' baby, it's never ever maybe

You think I might be crazy, but I gotta be ALL IN

 

Spoiler
Spoiler

#44 Delyruin

Delyruin

    Crewman Apprentice

  • Members
  • 88 posts

Posted 28 August 2015 - 12:24 AM

"One-off" meaning you can only get one of it, ever. Its relation with the Haven is all up in the air.

I know what it means, hence why I came to the above conclusion. 

 

Anywho, I did come to the (maybe?)false thought that High Charity would replace the Havens as well.

 

I personally hope it does not.



#45 SiRD31M0S

SiRD31M0S

    Forum Jester

  • Authorized Playtester
  • 859 posts
  • Steam:sird31mos
  • LocationThe infinitesimal space between thoughts, on the cusp of uncountable instances of possibility.

Posted 28 August 2015 - 12:36 AM

Its relation with the Haven is all up in the air.

Considering the Covenant are hardly masters of defense, I doubt the Haven is going anywhere.


I am a naturally philosophical and industrious evil.

 

It's all or nothin' baby, it's never ever maybe

You think I might be crazy, but I gotta be ALL IN

 

Spoiler
Spoiler

#46 Delyruin

Delyruin

    Crewman Apprentice

  • Members
  • 88 posts

Posted 28 August 2015 - 12:42 AM

I completely read/understood what you said the first time but ok. Was simply providing my own, personal opinion on the matter....

 

I suppose I double understand now?



#47 SiRD31M0S

SiRD31M0S

    Forum Jester

  • Authorized Playtester
  • 859 posts
  • Steam:sird31mos
  • LocationThe infinitesimal space between thoughts, on the cusp of uncountable instances of possibility.

Posted 28 August 2015 - 12:47 AM

Are you sure? I could make it bigger if you're going to keep latching on to the going-away party you started planning for the Haven.


I am a naturally philosophical and industrious evil.

 

It's all or nothin' baby, it's never ever maybe

You think I might be crazy, but I gotta be ALL IN

 

Spoiler
Spoiler

#48 Delyruin

Delyruin

    Crewman Apprentice

  • Members
  • 88 posts

Posted 28 August 2015 - 01:07 AM

So cheeky. ^_^

 

Anyhow, let me save you the work:

 

 

Its relation with the Haven is all up in the air.

 

 

This is the biggest the forum will let me go, size 48.

 

now understand you 48 times more. Excellent work S F I R.


  • Unikraken likes this

#49 SiRD31M0S

SiRD31M0S

    Forum Jester

  • Authorized Playtester
  • 859 posts
  • Steam:sird31mos
  • LocationThe infinitesimal space between thoughts, on the cusp of uncountable instances of possibility.

Posted 28 August 2015 - 01:15 AM

All in a day's work.

 

But wait! The standard text size is 14! You actually understand me roughly 3.4 times more. Check and mate.


  • Unikraken likes this

I am a naturally philosophical and industrious evil.

 

It's all or nothin' baby, it's never ever maybe

You think I might be crazy, but I gotta be ALL IN

 

Spoiler
Spoiler




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users