Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Photo

I dun get it.


  • Please log in to reply
34 replies to this topic

#21 D4RKST0RM99

D4RKST0RM99

    There's a DarkStorm coming Mr. Canadaman...

  • Authorized Playtester
  • 961 posts
  • LocationScotland

Posted 25 December 2013 - 10:14 PM

They may not have colonized many planets. They may have been wiped out so easily because of some kind of minimalistic choice on their part. 

Strange that was also mentioned in Silentium,

Spoiler

Seems we are the exception when it comes to exploding population numbers, least for a evolved mamalian species so not every race has to spread over every inch of the galaxy so.......

as a race are we hoarders?



#22 SternuS

SternuS

    Playtester of the poor

  • Authorized Playtester
  • 2,806 posts
  • Steam:SternuS
  • LocationItaly

Posted 26 December 2013 - 09:03 AM

as a race are we hoarders?

History would teach us so, but then...why should we have inherited the Mantle?

Forerunners protected life; we used, and are still using it, to accomplish our will. We take care of what is suitable for us, for our subsistence, and we wipe out what is unnecessary or dangerous, careless of the consequences.

 

Why did Precursors choose us?


c048b5cb018d634cb3a0d9bd3617eb50-d547q01

Peter Jackson, 27/07/2013: 1.08 am. A 20 hour day ... 15 years of Tolkien ... 771 days of shooting ...

"We would be fools to pursue the impossible simply because you believe the achievable is flawed" - Ugin

 


#23 D4RKST0RM99

D4RKST0RM99

    There's a DarkStorm coming Mr. Canadaman...

  • Authorized Playtester
  • 961 posts
  • LocationScotland

Posted 26 December 2013 - 10:36 AM

History would teach us so, but then...why should we have inherited the Mantle?

Forerunners protected life; we used, and are still using it, to accomplish our will. We take care of what is suitable for us, for our subsistence, and we wipe out what is unnecessary or dangerous, careless of the consequences.

 

Why did Precursors choose us?

It's more like they tested the Forerunners- they failed and deemed unworthy of carrying the Mantle then humanity is next to be tested, this was more or less revealed in Primordium between the Timeless One and the Iso-Didact after its capture and before its execution, after a hundred and one thousand centuries the flood would return.



#24 SPECTRE

SPECTRE

    Banned user who criticised terrorists

  • Members
  • 3,455 posts
  • LocationANGLIA BRUV, HOME TO THE PRODIGY, NON CRIMINAL GANGSTAS AND FARMERS

Posted 26 December 2013 - 10:54 AM

History would teach us so, but then...why should we have inherited the Mantle?

Forerunners protected life; we used, and are still using it, to accomplish our will. We take care of what is suitable for us, for our subsistence, and we wipe out what is unnecessary or dangerous, careless of the consequences.

 

Why did Precursors choose us?

Perhaps because they knew the forerunners would eventually slaughter them in genocide.


I'm back (temp)

Spoiler

#25 SternuS

SternuS

    Playtester of the poor

  • Authorized Playtester
  • 2,806 posts
  • Steam:SternuS
  • LocationItaly

Posted 26 December 2013 - 03:56 PM

It's more like they tested the Forerunners- they failed and deemed unworthy of carrying the Mantle then humanity is next to be tested, this was more or less revealed in Primordium between the Timeless One and the Iso-Didact after its capture and before its execution, after a hundred and one thousand centuries the flood would return.

 

How did the Forerunners fail? In the book there is written that the Flood is some sort of a test; but Ancient Humans faced the Flood before the Forerunners. The Flood is the "evolution" of the Precursors, who have been hunted by the Forerunners. The Forerunners (thousands of years before they met Humans) committed a patricide because they were not chosen as inheritors of the Mantle. They were not chosen because they failed...a test?

Perhaps because they knew the forerunners would eventually slaughter them in genocide.

They knew they would've been killed, eventually.

I mean, you can be the dumbest/smartest intelligence ever, but you DON'T create something that you know for sure it'll murder you. You just don't.


c048b5cb018d634cb3a0d9bd3617eb50-d547q01

Peter Jackson, 27/07/2013: 1.08 am. A 20 hour day ... 15 years of Tolkien ... 771 days of shooting ...

"We would be fools to pursue the impossible simply because you believe the achievable is flawed" - Ugin

 


#26 SPECTRE

SPECTRE

    Banned user who criticised terrorists

  • Members
  • 3,455 posts
  • LocationANGLIA BRUV, HOME TO THE PRODIGY, NON CRIMINAL GANGSTAS AND FARMERS

Posted 26 December 2013 - 04:05 PM

I mean, you can be the dumbest/smartest intelligence ever, but you DON'T create something that you know for sure it'll murder you. You just don't.

The children of failing empires. That is all.


I'm back (temp)

Spoiler

#27 HolyMith

HolyMith

    Crewman Apprentice

  • Members
  • 35 posts
  • LocationAbove the Damoclean Sword

Posted 26 December 2013 - 05:57 PM

I'm pretty sure the only viable way they could have been defeated is if the Precursors were very few in number, and they created the Forerunners. The Forerunners then multiplied rapidly and the Precursors (not wanting to intervene) allowed them to forge a powerful empire. The Forerunners caught them with their pants down because they never truly believed they would turn against them. The Forerunners also must have wiped them out quickly to stop them fleeing to other galaxies, as they were supposedly capable of doing.

Another thing that confused me is that all record of the war with the Precursors was lost. A civilisation that grows to that level of organisation and development does not lose so much data, and important data at that.



#28 D4RKST0RM99

D4RKST0RM99

    There's a DarkStorm coming Mr. Canadaman...

  • Authorized Playtester
  • 961 posts
  • LocationScotland

Posted 26 December 2013 - 06:49 PM

I'm pretty sure the only viable way they could have been defeated is if the Precursors were very few in number, and they created the Forerunners. The Forerunners then multiplied rapidly and the Precursors (not wanting to intervene) allowed them to forge a powerful empire. The Forerunners caught them with their pants down because they never truly believed they would turn against them. The Forerunners also must have wiped them out quickly to stop them fleeing to other galaxies, as they were supposedly capable of doing.
Another thing that confused me is that all record of the war with the Precursors was lost. A civilisation that grows to that level of organisation and development does not lose so much data, and important data at that.

You should really read Silentium, it answers a lot of your questions but still leaves enough mystery for future stories.
  • Defender0 likes this

#29 HolyMith

HolyMith

    Crewman Apprentice

  • Members
  • 35 posts
  • LocationAbove the Damoclean Sword

Posted 26 December 2013 - 10:07 PM

I think all 3 of the eventualities, are viable. And most likely it would be a mix of the 3.

Especially the last one.

So you mean most of them weren't aggressive, so they left the galaxy, the ones that remained were aggressive but very few in number so they got crushed. We shall have to wait and see if the canon sources elaborate more on this in the future. I can see now how it COULD have happened, but it would have to be a set of very unlikely advantages for the Forerunners.



#30 HolyMith

HolyMith

    Crewman Apprentice

  • Members
  • 35 posts
  • LocationAbove the Damoclean Sword

Posted 26 December 2013 - 10:08 PM

You should really read Silentium, it answers a lot of your questions but still leaves enough mystery for future stories.

Also, I have ordered it on Amazon and it should be here next week :D



#31 D4RKST0RM99

D4RKST0RM99

    There's a DarkStorm coming Mr. Canadaman...

  • Authorized Playtester
  • 961 posts
  • LocationScotland

Posted 26 December 2013 - 11:31 PM

Also, I have ordered it on Amazon and it should be here next week :D

I have on my ipad and was trying to post the relevent paragraph but now have issues with that option, still it be best I dont spoil too much

still a good read. Have u read the others in the series, Silentium is the concluding story of the 3.



#32 HolyMith

HolyMith

    Crewman Apprentice

  • Members
  • 35 posts
  • LocationAbove the Damoclean Sword

Posted 27 December 2013 - 02:17 AM

I have on my ipad and was trying to post the relevent paragraph but now have issues with that option, still it be best I dont spoil too much

still a good read. Have u read the others in the series, Silentium is the concluding story of the 3.

Yeah I have read Cryptum and Primordium. Been a while though, so I may re-read Primordium before going on to Silentium. I'll post back in three weeks when I have finished Silentium. I may have a changed opinion by then :P



#33 SPECTRE

SPECTRE

    Banned user who criticised terrorists

  • Members
  • 3,455 posts
  • LocationANGLIA BRUV, HOME TO THE PRODIGY, NON CRIMINAL GANGSTAS AND FARMERS

Posted 27 December 2013 - 09:38 AM

After reading silentium i really want to know what catalog looks like.

Also is it Silent-ium

or silen-shum?


I'm back (temp)

Spoiler

#34 D4RKST0RM99

D4RKST0RM99

    There's a DarkStorm coming Mr. Canadaman...

  • Authorized Playtester
  • 961 posts
  • LocationScotland

Posted 27 December 2013 - 09:56 AM

After reading silentium i really want to know what catalog looks like.

Also is it Silent-ium

or silen-shum?

I've assumed the first one since its also Primor- dium, silent- ium, normally its the combination of two words like Crypt and Sanctum= Cryptum, more to do with the meaning than just the spelling.



#35 SternuS

SternuS

    Playtester of the poor

  • Authorized Playtester
  • 2,806 posts
  • Steam:SternuS
  • LocationItaly

Posted 27 December 2013 - 11:31 AM

After reading silentium i really want to know what catalog looks like.

Also is it Silent-ium

or silen-shum?

It's Latin, the "t" is soft. Like "propagation", "reproduction".


  • Moustachio86 and SPECTRE like this

c048b5cb018d634cb3a0d9bd3617eb50-d547q01

Peter Jackson, 27/07/2013: 1.08 am. A 20 hour day ... 15 years of Tolkien ... 771 days of shooting ...

"We would be fools to pursue the impossible simply because you believe the achievable is flawed" - Ugin

 





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users