You literally made all of that up.
THANK YOU. He tells me not to use my source but then goes and sputters shit without citing anything? Normally he wouldn't be for thread locking but since he knows he's wrong, and the SPECTRE species cannot admit they are wrong, he needs another way out.
Tell me then why has a ventral beam never been used in space combat then?
What? You're grammar is really bad. But if i think i'm reading is what you're saying:
You do use different rounds for different ranges, at longer ranges you may want a heavier round, because you're going to loose KE. At shorter range you're going to need a lighter round, because you need to kill them ASAP.
A: I'm pretty sure that we've never even seen an energy projector be used in game, and since the games trump all other canon, your point doesn't make much sense. Furthermore, the Grafton was destroyed by a ventral energy projector.
B: this is space combat. The physics are fucked and I'm pretty sure outside of the Keyes Loop they have never been officially explained. Anyways, I'm fairly sure energy would not even need a "heavier" round considering it's in space and it wouldn't have any begging forces acting against it.
SPECTRE YOURE WRONG ADMIT IT
Also, apparently different rounds aren't needed for in atmospheric use because A: the Grafton MAC'd a cloaking spire with it's regular projectiles, and an orbital MAC shot down a corvette in the lake by ONI Sword Base. Halo cannot into physics